Entry 003
Let us assume we transplant the essance of the human individual into an animal or an insect, we can call it a soul, consciousness or some part of the brain responsible for most of the individuality. The new being would take on the name of chimera, but it in itself would still understand what it was before the transfusion and after. What I'm getting at is that we have a way to name every living beings bodily-machine.
If the body changes but consciousness remains intact that would mean that it in itself is another being of itself that plays by different rules in comparison to other animals and insects that don't consciously understand themselves by an individual name.
"Human is a being that lives in duality, always contradicting itself by coming to terms with his natural animalistic body and yet trying to rule over it by taking aid from consciousness which takes on the mask of individuality and receives a name from it's foster parents. It lives, as long as it remembers it's name or takes on a new one by that time changing itself to fit the new form."
We could say that from what was said, society is divided by categories of consciousness which assume a different degree of control over the animal which we call human.
Cheeky Snowflake Community Member 
|
|
